Thursday, October 8, 2009

Birds in the Spring

The amazing work on the Mickey Mouse cartoons of 1933 so far sets high bar for the Silly Symphonies to meet. Birds in the Spring doesn’t quite live up to that, I have to be honest. It is still a good short, and it has moments of wonderful work, but overall falls short of the Mickeys.



To be fair, this is a pastoral short, much more of a throwback to the earlier Silly Symphonies, like the “season” shorts of Summer or Spring. As such, it lacks a strong story with major conflict, even though it does have a main narrative. There is one standout character that makes it all worthwhile, though.

The basics of the short follow a family of birds, as they are born and grow up. There are three birds born at the same time, and one is obviously different. The “black sheep” of the family, this small bird messes up the singing of his brothers, and ends up on his own out in the world by accident. The chaos ensues.



Our little hero bird causes a lot of problems, including getting chased by a snake that he ties in knots and starting a swarm of bees rampaging through the woods. This little bird is a very appealing character, a hopeful blunderer that causes chaos in his wake. In some ways, he is reminiscent of Pluto.



The bird is done well, and makes the short more fun than a simple slice of life piece. Having this “child” be the lead character was a great choice by the Disney crew. The only problem is that by having him be the well intentioned blunderer, there’s no real sense of conflict to the proceedings.

Contrast this bird’s actions with those of Pluto in Mickey’s Pal Pluto. Pluto also causes some unintentional chaos, but then redeems himself with the heroic rescue of the kittens from the well. This bird does no such thing, but instead ends up being reprimanded by his father as the short ends.



Still, the short is fun, and that counts for a lot. You feel good watching it, because of the bright colors and peaceful nature. I will say that after a few minutes, I got tired of the chirping from the various birds, but that wore off towards the end as I got more involved in the action.

There’s even some great animation work here, such as the scene where the birds are first born. After they hatch, the baby birds start crying, and the scene fades between the three of them crying to a shot of them singing years later, as fully formed children. It’s a great transition that defies normal expectations.



Like I said, this short is enjoyable, and it features some good character design and animation on the lead bird, as well as some nice color and backgrounds. But as a whole, it can’t live up to the work that Disney has been producing on the Mickey shorts of 1933. That’s a high bar to clear, though, so this one is still worth checking out.

All images copyright Disney. All rights reserved.


1 comment:

  1. This is an ideal choice for an early colour short – what's more colourful than birds in the spring? The technicolor of the Silly Symphonies is finally being reflected in the titles, where instead of the drab brown we're used to, this one features a multi-coloured opening card. There's even an attempt to make the type jump right off the screen with a bold drop shadow, which doesn't quite work.

    Otto, the baby bird, really stands out as a fun little character and it's great fun watching his mischievous adventure. We get to see some of those tuneful Disney humming birds again, plus I think it's Disney's first use of a hypnotic snake (Kaa anyone?) and the swallowing-a-grasshopper gag. One scene worth checking out is when the bees first fly out of the hive – there's some great use of perspective for a really dynamic effect.

    I don't think this is quite as much fun as the recent Mickey's either, but it's still a very worthy Disney entry. Again, I think the early scenes attempt a more naturalistic animation style than the animators are quite capable of in this era. However, it's already an improvement over a similar scene at the start of "Babes in the Wood".

    ReplyDelete